Mahkamah Mahkamah Agung Republik Ma

Mahkamah Mahkamah Agung Republik Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Republik Indonesia
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id
Hal 1 dari 52 hal Put. Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
P U T U S A N
Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA
M A H K A M A H A G U N G
memeriksa perkara perdata khusus hak kekayaan intelektual (merek) pada
tingkat kasasi telah memutuskan sebagai berikut dalam perkara antara:
INTER IKEA SYSTEM B.V., suatu perseroan yang didirikan
berdasarkan Undang-undang Negara Belanda, beralamat di 2
Hullenbergweg, NL-1101 BL, Amsterdam, the Netherland, yang
diwakili Gabrielle Olsson, selaku Managing Director, Legal Affairs,
dalam hal ini memberi kuasa kepada Daru Lukiantono, S.H., dan
M. Raja Mada Silalahi, S.H., M.Phil., LLM., Para Advokat,
beralamat di Gedung Bursa Efek Indonesia, Menara II, Lantai 21,
Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Kav. 52-53, Jakarta, berdasarkan Surat
Kuasa Khusus tanggal 20 Maret 2014, sebagai Pemohon Kasasi
dahulu Tergugat;
m e l a w a n
PT. RATANIA KHATULISTIWA, beralamat di Jalan Greges Barat
Nomor 17 A, Asemrowo, Kelurahan Greges, Kecamatan
Asemrowo, Surabaya, yang diwakili oleh Ir. I Made
Indrawandalam hal ini memberi kuasa kepada Subagio Aridarmo,
S.H., dan kawan-kawan, para Advokat, beralamat di Arthaloka
Building, 15th Floor, suite 1510, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav.2,
Jakarta, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tanggal 19 November
2014, sebagai Termohon Kasasi dahulu Penggugat;
d a n
PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA cq. KEMENTERIAN
HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA R.I. cq. DIREKTORAT
JENDERAL HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL cq. DIREKTORAT
MEREK, beralamat di Jalan H.R Rasuna Said Kav. 8-9 Jakarta
Selatan, sebagai Turut Termohon Kasasi dahulu Turut Tergugat;
Mahkamah Agung tersebut;
Membaca surat-surat yang bersangkutan;
Menimbang, bahwa dari surat-surat tersebut ternyata bahwa sekarang
Termohon Kasasi dahulu sebagai Penggugat telah mengajukan gugatan
Disclaimer
Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia berusaha untuk selalu mencantumkan informasi paling kini dan akurat sebagai bentuk komitmen Mahkamah Agung untuk pelayanan publik, transparansi dan akuntabilitas pelaksanaan fungsi peradilan. Namun Dalam hal Anda menemukan inakurasi informasi yang termuat pada situs ini atau informasi yang seharusnya ada, namun belum tersedia, maka harap segera hubungi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI melalui :
Email : [e-mail]
Telp : 021-384 3348 (ext.318) Halaman 1
Mahkamah Mahkamah Agung Republik Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Republik Indonesia
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id
Hal 2 dari 52 hal Put. Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015
terhadap Pemohon Kasasi dahulu sebagai Tergugat di depan persidangan
Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat, pada pokoknya
sebagai berikut:
1. Bahwa Penggugat adalah suatu Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan pada
tahun 1999 berdasarkan Akta Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Nomor 46
tanggal tujuh Oktober tahun seribu sembilan ratus delapan puluh delapan
(7-10-1988) oleh Trisnawati Mulia,S.H., Notaris di Jakarta, sebagaimana
tercatat dalam Tambahan Berita-Negara R.I tanggal 23/12-1989 Nomor
102 (Bukti P-1), dan terakhir telah diubah melalui Akta Nomor 58 tanggal
15 Juli 2008 oleh Maria Rahmawati Gunawan,S.H., Notaris di Jakarta
(Bukti P-2);
2. Bahwa Penggugat adalah perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang industri
furniture dari kayu dan rotan, dengan jenis industri (KLUI) 3601 dan 3602,
sebagaimana tercantum dalam Izin Usaha Industri milik Penggugat yang
diterbitkan oleh Dinas Perindustrian, Perdagangan dan Penanaman
Modal Pemerintah Kota Surabaya pada tanggal 4 April 2003 (Bukti P-3).
Kegiatan usaha Penggugat dalam bidang furniture rotan, kayu dan besi
juga tercantum dalam Surat Izin Usaha Perdagangan (Menengah) Nomor
503/10352A/436.66.11/2010 tanggal 20 Desember 2010 yang diterbitkan
oleh Dinas Perdagangan dan Perindustrian Kota Surabaya (Bukti P-4);
3. Bahwa sejak didirikan hingga saat ini, dalam kegiatan usaha industrinya
Penggugat telah membuat dan memproduksi berbagai macam produk
perabot-perabot rumah yang terbuat dari kayu dan rotan, seperti meja,
cermin-cermin (mirror), headboard, drawer (meja rias), big basket, kursikursi
dari rotan, leha-leha loanger chair (kursi malas) dining chair (kursi
makan) dan produk-produk lainnya sebagaimana tercantum dalam Nota
Pelayanan Ekspor (NPE), Pemberitahuan Ekspor Barang (PEB), Bill of
Lading, Bon Pengantar Barang dan Lampiran Surat Jalan (Bukti P-5);
Selain itu, Penggugat juga berencana untuk membuat industri dan
memproduksi perkakas dan wadah-wadah untuk rumah tangga atau
dapur, gelas-gelas dan barang pecah belah dari bahan tembikar;
4. Bahwa Penggugat adalah perusahaan dan produsen produk-produk
furniture dari kayu dan rotan yang berorientasi ekspor dan sejak didirikan
hingga saat ini telah bertahun-tahun memasarkan

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

The Court Of The Supreme Court Of The Republic Supreme Court Republic Of IndonesiaThe Supreme Court Of The Republic Of IndonesiaThe Republic Of IndonesiaDirectories Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Indonesiaputusan.mahkamahagung.go.idPage 1 of 52 things Put. Number 264 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2015P U T U S A NNumber 264 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2015FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE BASED ON THE ALMIGHTY GODHEADM A K A H M A H A G U N Gcheck out the special civil litigation of intellectual property rights (brands) onthe level of Cassation has ruled as follows in a matter between:INTER IKEA SYSTEMS B.V., a company foundedunder the laws of the country of Netherlands, located at 2Hullenbergweg, NL-1101 BL, Amsterdam, the Netherland, whichrepresented by Gabrielle Olsson, as Managing Director, Legal Affairs,in this case gives authority to the Daru Lukiantono, S.H., andM. Raja Silalahi Mada, S.H., M.phil., LLM., The Advocate,located at Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II, 21st floor,Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 52-53, Jakarta, based on a letterSpecial power of attorney dated March 20, 2014, as the applicant's Cassationfirst the Defendants;m e l a w a nPT. RATANIA Equator, located on the Road West of GregesNumber 17 A, Asemrowo, Kelurahan, Kecamatan GregesAsemrowo, Surabaya, represented by Ir. I MadeIndrawandalam it gives authority to the Aridarmo, SubagioS.h., and coauthors, the advocate, located at ArthalokaBuilding, 15th Floor, suite 1510, Jalan Sudirman Kav. 2,Jakarta, based on a special power of attorney dated 19 November2014, as the respondent Plaintiff first Cassation;d a nThe GOVERNMENT of the REPUBLIC of INDONESIA cq. The MINISTRY ofLAW and HUMAN RIGHT Royally cq. The DIRECTORATEGENERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of cq. The DIRECTORATEBrand, located at Jalan H R Rasuna Said Kav. 8-9, JakartaThe South, as the co-designer of the respondent first became one of Cassation Defendants;The Supreme Court;Read the letters in question;Considering, that of those turned out letters that nowThe respondent first Cassation as the plaintiff had filed a lawsuitDisclaimerRegistrar of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia is trying to include the most accurate information and now as a form of commitment to the Supreme Court to public services, transparency and accountability of the implementation of the judicial function. However, in the event that you discover inaccuracies in information contained on this site or the information it is supposed to be, but is not yet available, please immediately contact the Registrar of the Supreme Court RI through:Email: [e-mail]: 021-384 3348 (ext. 322) page 1The Court Of The Supreme Court Of The Republic Supreme Court Republic Of IndonesiaThe Supreme Court Of The Republic Of IndonesiaThe Republic Of IndonesiaDirectories Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Indonesiaputusan.mahkamahagung.go.idPage 2 of 52 things Put. Number 264 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2015against the applicant's Cassation formerly as Defendants in future proceedingsCommercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court, substantiallyas follows:1. That the plaintiff is a limited liability company established inin 1999 based on the deed of establishment of the limited liability company the number 46the seven-date October nineteen hundred eighty-eight(7-10-1988) by Trisnawati, S.H., notary public in Jakarta, asrecorded in Additional News-States r. I on 23/12-1989 Number102 (proof of P-1) and last amended through Deed Number 58 dateJuly 15th, 2008 by Maria Rahmawati Gunawan, S.H., notary public in Jakarta(Proof of P-2);2. That the plaintiff is a company engaged in the field of industryfurniture made of wood and rattan, with the type of industry (KLUI) 3601 3602 and,as stated in the business license of industrial property of the Plaintiffpublished by the Department of industry, trade and CultivationThe Government's capital city of Surabaya on April 4, 2003 (proof of P-3).The business activities of the plaintiff in the field of furniture rattan, wood and ironalso listed in the Trade Business Licence (Medium) number503/10352A/436.66.11/2010 dated December 20, 2010 publishedby the Department of trade and industry of the city of Surabaya (proof of P-4);3. That since its founding to the present, in its industrial business activitiesThe plaintiff has been creating and producing a wide range of productsfurniture-home furnishings made of wood and rattan, such as tables,mirror-mirror (mirror), headboard, dining drawer (vanity), big basketball, kursikursirattan, leha-leha loanger chair (recliner) dining chair (Chairto eat) and other products as listed in the MemorandumExport service (NPE), notification of the export of goods (PEB), the Bill ofLading, Bon Introductory items and Attachments the way (proof of P-5);In addition, the Plaintiffs also plan to make the industry andproducing gadgets and containers-containers for household orkitchen, glasses and glassware from pottery;4. That the plaintiff was firm and manufacturer productsfurniture of wood and rattan are export-oriented and since it was foundedup to this time had many years to market

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

Court of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
the Indonesian Supreme Court
of the Republic of Indonesia
Directory Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id
Page 1 of 52 things Put. No. 264 K / Pdt.Sus-IPR / 2015
P REPRESENTING
No. 264 K / Pdt.Sus-IPR / 2015
FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE UNDER THE ONE ALMIGHTY
M AHKAMAHAGUNG
check the special civil cases of intellectual property rights (brands) at
the level of appeal has been decided as follows in the case of:
INTER IKEA SYSTEM BV, a company incorporated
under the Law of the Netherlands, located at 2
Hullenbergweg, NL-1101 BL, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, who
represented Gabrielle Olsson, Managing Director, Legal Affairs,
in this case authorizes the Daru Lukiantono, SH, and
M. King Mada Silalahi, SH, M. Phil., LLM., The Advocate,
located at Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II, 21st Floor,
Jalan Sudirman, Kav. 52-53, Jakarta, by virtue of a
Special Power of Attorney dated March 20, 2014, as Cassation
formerly the Defendant;
against
PT. RATANIA KHATULISTIWA, located at Jalan West Greges
No. 17 A, Asemrowo, Village Greges, District
Asemrowo, Surabaya, represented by Ir. I Made
Indrawandalam it authorizes the Subagio Aridarmo,
SH, et al, the Advocate, whose address Arthaloka
Building, 15th Floor, suite 1510, Kav.2 Jalan Sudirman,
Jakarta, based on Special Power of Attorney dated November 19
, 2014, as Respondent Cassation formerly the Plaintiff;
and
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA cq. MINISTRY
OF JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS RI cq. DIRECTORATE
GENERAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS cq. DIRECTORATE
BRAND, located at Jalan HR Rasuna Said Kav. 8-9 Jakarta
Selatan, as Co-Respondent Cassation formerly Co-Defendants;
The Supreme Court;
Read the letters in question;
Considering that of the letters turned out that now
the Respondent Cassation previously as Plaintiff has filed
Disclaimer
Registrar of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia strives to always give the best information current and accurate as a commitment to the Supreme Court for the public service, transparency and accountability in the implementation of judicial functions. But in case you find inakurasi information contained on this website or information that should be, but is not available, then please immediately contact the Registrar of the Supreme Court through:
Email: [e-mail]
Tel: [phone] (ext. 318) page 1
Court of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
the Indonesian Supreme Court
of the Republic of Indonesia
Directory Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id
page 2 of 52 things Put. No. 264 K / Pdt.Sus-IPR / 2015
against the Cassation advance as Defendant in front of the court
of the Commercial Court at Central Jakarta District Court, in essence,
as follows:
1. That the plaintiff is a limited liability company established in
1999 pursuant to the Deed of Establishment of Company limited Number 46
dated October seven thousand nine hundred and eighty-eight
(7-10-1988) by Trisnawati Honor, SH, Notary in Jakarta, as
noted in the State Gazette RI-23 / 12-1989 No.
102 (Exhibit P- 1), and last amended by Act No. 58 dated
July 15, 2008 by Maria Rahmawati Gunawan, SH, Notary in Jakarta
(Exhibit P-2);
2. That the Plaintiff is a company engaged in manufacturing
furniture of wood and rattan, with the type of industry (KLUI) 3601 and 3602,
as contained in industrial business license of the Plaintiff which
is published by the Department of Industry, Trade and Investment
Capital City Government of Surabaya on 4 April 2003 (Exhibit P-3).
Plaintiff business activities in the field of furniture of rattan, wood and iron
are also listed in the Trade Permit (Secondary) No.
503 / 10352A / 436.66.11 / 2010 dated December 20, 2010 issued
by the Department of Trade and Industry, Surabaya (Exhibit P-4) ;
3. That since its establishment until today, the industrial business activities
Plaintiffs have made and produces a wide range of products
of the furniture house made of wood and rattan, such as tables,
mirrors (mirrors), headboard, drawer (vanity), big basket, kursikursi
of rattan, inattentive, careless loanger chair (recliner) dining chair (chair
eat) and other products as specified in the Memorandum of
Services Exports (NPE), Export Declaration (PEB), Bill of
Lading, Bon Introduction goods and Annex Letter (Exhibit P-5);
In addition, Plaintiffs also plans to make industry and
manufactures tools and containers for household or
kitchen, glasses and crockery of earthenware;
4. That the plaintiff company and manufacturer of products
furniture from wood and rattan export oriented and since its establishment
until today has many years of marketing